Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Pallorous amnesiac talks about the final last chance ... until the next one ... and the next ... and yet another ...
Go To FrontPage Now!
Here's how. Here's why:
"FP: So do you think the WMD is the central issue regarding Iraq?
Tierney: No, and it never should have been an issue. The First Gulf War -- and I use this term as a convention, since this is actually all the same war -- was a prime example of managing war instead of waging it. Instead of telling Saddam to get out of Kuwait or we will push him out, we should have said to get out of Kuwait or we will remove him from power. As it was, we were projecting our respect for human life on Saddam, when actually, from his point of view, we were doing him a favor by killing mostly Shi’ite military members who were a threat to his regime. I realize that Saudi Arabia, our host, did not want a change in government in Iraq, and they had helped us bring down the Soviet Union with oil price manipulation, but we should have bent them to our will instead of vice versa. Saddam would not have risked losing power to keep Kuwait, and we could have avoided this whole ordeal.
We topped one mistake with another, expecting Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party, a criminal syndicate masquerading as a political party, to abide by any arms control agreement. Gun control and Arms control both arise from the “mankind is good” worldview. If you control the environment, i.e. get rid of the guns, then man’s natural goodness will rise to the surface. I hope it is evidence after more than a decade of Iraqi intransigence how foolish this position is. The sobering fact is that if a nation feels it is in their best interest to have certain weapons, they are going to have them. Chemical weapons were critical to warding off hoards of Iranian fighters, and the Iraqis knew they would always be in a position of weakness against Israel without nuclear weapons. The United States kept nuclear weapons to deter the Soviet Union, but we would deny the same logic for Iraq?
There is also the practicality of weapons inspections/weapons hunts. After seventeen resolutions pleading with the Iraqis to be nice, the light bulb still didn’t go off that the entire concept is fundamentally flawed. Would you like to live in a city where the police chief sent out resolutions to criminals to play nice, instead of taking them off the streets? "
(HT Power Line)
"FP: So do you think the WMD is the central issue regarding Iraq?
Tierney: No, and it never should have been an issue. The First Gulf War -- and I use this term as a convention, since this is actually all the same war -- was a prime example of managing war instead of waging it. Instead of telling Saddam to get out of Kuwait or we will push him out, we should have said to get out of Kuwait or we will remove him from power. As it was, we were projecting our respect for human life on Saddam, when actually, from his point of view, we were doing him a favor by killing mostly Shi’ite military members who were a threat to his regime. I realize that Saudi Arabia, our host, did not want a change in government in Iraq, and they had helped us bring down the Soviet Union with oil price manipulation, but we should have bent them to our will instead of vice versa. Saddam would not have risked losing power to keep Kuwait, and we could have avoided this whole ordeal.
We topped one mistake with another, expecting Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party, a criminal syndicate masquerading as a political party, to abide by any arms control agreement. Gun control and Arms control both arise from the “mankind is good” worldview. If you control the environment, i.e. get rid of the guns, then man’s natural goodness will rise to the surface. I hope it is evidence after more than a decade of Iraqi intransigence how foolish this position is. The sobering fact is that if a nation feels it is in their best interest to have certain weapons, they are going to have them. Chemical weapons were critical to warding off hoards of Iranian fighters, and the Iraqis knew they would always be in a position of weakness against Israel without nuclear weapons. The United States kept nuclear weapons to deter the Soviet Union, but we would deny the same logic for Iraq?
There is also the practicality of weapons inspections/weapons hunts. After seventeen resolutions pleading with the Iraqis to be nice, the light bulb still didn’t go off that the entire concept is fundamentally flawed. Would you like to live in a city where the police chief sent out resolutions to criminals to play nice, instead of taking them off the streets? "
(HT Power Line)
Scrappleface has pretty much all you need to know about the Plame fiasco. You'll never laugh harder!
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
"Paris burns anyway. As the French seem to learn every 70 years, appeasement does not work. It merely whets the appetite. And the angry alien young were already hungry."
On Setting Them Free
DETAILS, DETAILS DEPT: "There are important consequences of a prisoner of war designation that have nothing to do with the humane treatment that all detainees receive. For example, the Geneva Prisoner of War Convention provides legal immunity for precapture warlike acts. This means that there could be no future prosecution of terrorists who are deemed to be prisoners of war." OOPS.
So. We finally come to incontrovertible proof that liberals are actually not even in favor of prosecuting terrorists as criminals. They just want to set them free!
Of course, most of them haven't even read Geneva to know it. But you can guess what I think of the ones that actually have...
So. We finally come to incontrovertible proof that liberals are actually not even in favor of prosecuting terrorists as criminals. They just want to set them free!
Of course, most of them haven't even read Geneva to know it. But you can guess what I think of the ones that actually have...
EURABIAN DEATH SPIRAL DEJA VU REDUX: "Actually, refer back to my college sophomores point. One’s not ready to be a parent until one is ready to stop being a child."
HE'S BAAACK: "Their current claim to have been fooled or deceived makes them out, on their own account, to be highly dumb and gullible. But as dumb and gullible as that?" This is one of Hitch's finest tinfoil hat vaporizations ever!
Monday, November 14, 2005
Saturday, November 12, 2005
Today's Wanton Ways
Z on the defensive finally? That -- at last -- the wanton destruction of "innocent" PALESTINIANS causes long, long overdue self examination tells you all you need to know. In fact, I think it's SO long overdue that it will soon be forgotten due to the burden of sustaining its novelty.
[ wanton: behave extremely cruelly and brutally ]
[ wanton: behave extremely cruelly and brutally ]
And Over To Roger
"I'm beginning to hope the traditionalists who think this is all about poverty and racism and not at all about rolling history back to 1492 are right. Because if they're wrong, this is not going to be over for a long time. The problem with the traditionalist's argument is that it is a tad racist in and of itself. It assumes these "youths" are ignorant of the demographics of the country they are living in and of the rudimentary history of Christianity and Islam. As they say in France, je m'en doute."
Apocalypse Warren In Due Course
"Soon, the average age in Europe will be beyond childbearing. Among non-Muslim Europeans, i[t] probably already is. We can no longer dream of a recovery. Europe has leapt. New immigrants are taking possession of the continent, transforming it, as in the "Dark Ages". Rome will be sacked again, in due course."
Today's Residue Update
"Yes, the student behavior was somewhat offensive. But the black gangsta identity—the glorification of drug-dealing, crime, and serial sexual conquest, coupled with a blithe rationalization of fatherless black children—is what really deserves condemnation and concern, and not just in black barbershops, churches, and homes. Bill Cosby excepted, however, few have raised public concerns when blacks outfit themselves in the sartorial and ethical drapery of common street hustlers. Many young blacks walk around saying n**** this, n**** that, but then take offense when others borrow the attendant stylistic signifiers, which our culture foolishly condones and celebrates as black authenticity."
Friday, November 11, 2005
Amnesia, Part 4,984,765
You may think that Bush is Hitler. You believe it with every fiber of your body. And you are passionately in favor of gun control. That would make you an amnesiac at best...
BusHitler has some comments on amnesia today as well. Finally.
BusHitler has some comments on amnesia today as well. Finally.
"I don't know, but it's surprising the extent to which people who routinely make the Halliburton and chickenhawk slurs seem to require much greater delicacy from others."
VDH Again...
"Second, for all our pride, we are not like the once-powerful — and scary — Soviet Union, so Latin Americans and Europeans know that there is rarely any price to be paid for attacking the United States. Slandering us is a win-win situation — cowardly and expedient to be sure, but hardly like indicting bin Laden or embargoing Iranian oil. No Argentinean is furious over Chinese unfair trade; no Spaniard protests Russian oilmen for spoiling the arctic. And worse still, we know why."
MSMemory Hole? Or just ADHD?: "Who could that be? Don't count on the Times or the Post to find that out for you."
So The NYeT
covers W's speech (finally) going after the 5th column Dhimmis today and here's how it ends:

In my opinion, that's pretty much all you need to know...
In my opinion, that's pretty much all you need to know...
What If They Held A War And Only One Side Came?
"But having said that, I do think that what's pathetic about all Western countries, including the United States, including France, including Canada, and a lot of other countries, is that they make these sort of high school sophist arguments about terrorism, as if it's some sort of theoretical debate. It's not. We're dealing with a very difficult situation here. And if you accord to terrorists all the rights of somebody who gets arrested for holding up a liquor store in Des Moines, you are going to lose to the terrorists, because when you accord them the full rights of somebody who is a criminal, you make it impossible to prosecute this as a war, which is what it is. "
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Sick French Accidents
"Now, Francois Bayrou, leader of the centrist group that with the neo-Gaullists, makes up Jacques Chirac's presidential majority, describes France as a "sick state, a state swollen into impotence" with "a democracy that doesn't work well." This means, he said, that "reality never enters political discussions."
But asked why the riots were happening here, since France's neighbors seemed to be escaping its misery, Bayrou offered a general response that, like the answers of the other politicians he condemned, hid from the specifics of both responsibilities and solution:
"As long as French democracy doesn't change," Bayrou said, "these accidents are going to continue." He left it there. "
But asked why the riots were happening here, since France's neighbors seemed to be escaping its misery, Bayrou offered a general response that, like the answers of the other politicians he condemned, hid from the specifics of both responsibilities and solution:
"As long as French democracy doesn't change," Bayrou said, "these accidents are going to continue." He left it there. "
Warren Again
"It is against this background reality, that the riots happening today across France must be considered. They are a turning point, not only in France but all Europe. For the “moral and demographic vacuum” I mentioned above, is not in France alone. The same cultural deathwish prevails in Spain, Italy, Germany, the Low Countries, Britain, Scandinavia -- and Canada, by the way. It is called “multiculturalism” in this generation, but in another generation will be called something else."
RTWT. It's short but action packed.
UPDATE: And check out QandO's commentary on Warren: "The French role? Pay for this time they need to organize and they will pretend, for a while, that the French are still in charge. And the French, if history is any indicator, are particularly adept at this role."
RTWT. It's short but action packed.
UPDATE: And check out QandO's commentary on Warren: "The French role? Pay for this time they need to organize and they will pretend, for a while, that the French are still in charge. And the French, if history is any indicator, are particularly adept at this role."
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
The Heart Of Nihilism ... Is Nothing
"Unless the invertebrates in charge can grow spines, France seems poised to become what Spain was before Ferdinand and Isabella, a patchwork of principalities where Moors ruled some communities, Christians others, with constant tension between them. It seems inconceivable that a civilized Western nation would bargain away to a handful of thugs its democratic principles and sovereignty over much of its territory.
But the Islamists may well succeed. For though what the Islamists believe in is vile and reactionary, it is something. The French believe in nothing."
But the Islamists may well succeed. For though what the Islamists believe in is vile and reactionary, it is something. The French believe in nothing."
Wow -- Blankley Is The Oracle Of Apocalypse
"As Paul Belien, writing from Brussels this weekend observed: "It is not anger that is driving the insurgents to take it out on the secularized welfare states of Old Europe. It is hatred. Hatred caused not by injustice suffered, but stemming from a sense of superiority. The "youths" do not blame the French, they despise them."
The Ambiguous Apocalypse
"Meanwhile, the Union for Islamic Organizations of France, which has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, has issued a fatwa declaring: “It is formally forbidden to any Muslim seeking divine grace and satisfaction to participate in any action that blindly hits private or public property or could constitute an attack on someone’s life.” There is a strange ambiguity in this, recalling that of the CAIR-backed American fatwa condemning attacks on innocent civilians without defining “innocent”: what constitutes attacking “blindly”? Is a focused, targeted attack somehow acceptable?
The time for such ambiguity is long past. And indeed, lines are being drawn everywhere."
The time for such ambiguity is long past. And indeed, lines are being drawn everywhere."
Monday, November 07, 2005
"One wonders why they have suddenly developed amnesia about it now." I don't. I call it the MSMemory Hole...
Sunday, November 06, 2005
Demarche Has Today's Eurabian Apocalypse Update
"It's like Baghdad here! It's the Apocalypse!" ...
"These riots may yet be put down without serious loss of life, but they are a glimpse of the future that awaits Europe. The youth who shouted out the phrase that is the title of this piece is sorely mistaken. Baghdad is on its way to recovery- Europe is on the slippery path to suicide by appeasement."
Go read it all...
"These riots may yet be put down without serious loss of life, but they are a glimpse of the future that awaits Europe. The youth who shouted out the phrase that is the title of this piece is sorely mistaken. Baghdad is on its way to recovery- Europe is on the slippery path to suicide by appeasement."
Go read it all...
Saturday, November 05, 2005
Youths Islamofascists Torched An Ambulance
Roger points out that the Islamofascist violence is not abating in France:
Oh, and they set a disabled woman on fire. Because they feel "oppressed" you see. C'est la vie...
Look down just a few posts to:
And it exposes the great Catch-22 of the advance of civilization: We've somehow advanced to the point where the best of our societies have their lives constantly at risk to help save nihilists. Because they truly believe that nobody is beyond the reach of being "saved". And the very success of our best via these heroic acts helps foster the very dependence that is a -- probably the -- critical root cause of nihilism.
And why do they perceive ambulances as evil? Because as PALLYWOOD makes clear, they themselves use them as mere props -- if not actual instruments of terror.
Widespread riots across impoverished areas of France took a malevolent turn in a ninth night of violence, as youths torched an ambulance and stoned medical workers coming to the aid of a sick person. Authorities arrested more than 200 people, an unprecedented sweep since the beginning of the unrest.And did I forget to mention that 9,000 police cars have been stoned in France since the beginning of the year? 9,000!?
Oh, and they set a disabled woman on fire. Because they feel "oppressed" you see. C'est la vie...
Look down just a few posts to:
It is better to be opposed by an enemy than to be adrift in meaninglessness, for the simulacrum of an enemy lends purpose to actions whose nihilism would otherwise be self-evident.Killing or even attempting to injure medical personnel in the act of rescue is nihilism pure and simple. The irony is that rationality would easily argue that anyone attacking medical personnel should either be killed on sight or immediately whisked into a rubber room.
And it exposes the great Catch-22 of the advance of civilization: We've somehow advanced to the point where the best of our societies have their lives constantly at risk to help save nihilists. Because they truly believe that nobody is beyond the reach of being "saved". And the very success of our best via these heroic acts helps foster the very dependence that is a -- probably the -- critical root cause of nihilism.
And why do they perceive ambulances as evil? Because as PALLYWOOD makes clear, they themselves use them as mere props -- if not actual instruments of terror.
"Recent newspaper stories report how imams and community "mothers" have been marching against the violence, only to have themselves stoned and jeered. De Villepin unleashed his ultimate weapon and it turned out to be a rubber sword.
What de Villepin's planning probably missed was that the millet system plus the Internet formed a combination that would go through the 21st century "impassable Ardennes" like s..t through a goose. The millet system meant that potentially hostile foci were were already pre-deployed outside the cordon, often in cities outside Paris. And the Internet of course ensured that command and control could be exercised at a distance by command cells despite any number of deployed riot police. My guess is that by day 6 or 7 the French leadership began to doubt whether their impenetrable defenses would hold. By 9th day, I think, a real panic had begun to set in and they are now scrambling for a Plan B."
What de Villepin's planning probably missed was that the millet system plus the Internet formed a combination that would go through the 21st century "impassable Ardennes" like s..t through a goose. The millet system meant that potentially hostile foci were were already pre-deployed outside the cordon, often in cities outside Paris. And the Internet of course ensured that command and control could be exercised at a distance by command cells despite any number of deployed riot police. My guess is that by day 6 or 7 the French leadership began to doubt whether their impenetrable defenses would hold. By 9th day, I think, a real panic had begun to set in and they are now scrambling for a Plan B."
Friday, November 04, 2005
The Root Of The French Fried Fires
"They therefore come to believe in the malevolence of those who maintain them in their limbo: and they want to keep alive the belief in this perfect malevolence, for it gives meaning-the only possible meaning-to their stunted lives. It is better to be opposed by an enemy than to be adrift in meaninglessness, for the simulacrum of an enemy lends purpose to actions whose nihilism would otherwise be self-evident."
UPDATE: Here's the non-signup link to the Taheri article you should have read by now.
UPDATE: Here's the non-signup link to the Taheri article you should have read by now.
'... the issue jelled around a demand by the representatives of the rioters that the French police leave the "occupied territories"'
Thursday, November 03, 2005
ORWELL SPINNING IN HIS GRAVE DEPT: "Aside from protecting us at the front and the rear, our great leader Kim Jong Il, the benevolent father of the people, showed us mercy by filtering the water. And, in order to help and care about the health of our people, he progressively practiced appropriate measures. Now, in North Korea, the land of pure hope, the people can gracefully drink clean water through the endless love of the great leader comrade Kim Jong Il." (HT Publius)
"But this is France."
UPDATE: "Sadek has learned how to be French. He is the perfect Frenchman. The path ahead is tough- and he quit. Fight the Nazis? Non, too hard. Carry groceries up stairs? Merde! J'ai stoppé."
AND I WOULD TOP THIS BUT I CAN'T: From his hospital bed, Le Pew issued an apology to the Parisian cat community, explaining that "I am to be walking in zee park one day, in ze merry merry month of Mai," and "Pepe, he is to thinking this feline girl, she is un belle skunk femme fatale, no?"
UPDATE: "Sadek has learned how to be French. He is the perfect Frenchman. The path ahead is tough- and he quit. Fight the Nazis? Non, too hard. Carry groceries up stairs? Merde! J'ai stoppé."
AND I WOULD TOP THIS BUT I CAN'T: From his hospital bed, Le Pew issued an apology to the Parisian cat community, explaining that "I am to be walking in zee park one day, in ze merry merry month of Mai," and "Pepe, he is to thinking this feline girl, she is un belle skunk femme fatale, no?"
"C.S. Lewis once said that the greatest advantage that the devil has is the belief that he doesn't exist."
Darn, and I was so sure listening to the lefties that being high and dry in Colorado would be such a good real estate investment...
Wednesday, November 02, 2005
"Precisely those who do not recognize Israel's right to exist have been opposed to the birth of an independent Palestinian state. Such as happened in 1948 when, in order to prevent the Jewish state from seeing the light of day, they only prevented the creation of the Palestinian state foreseen in 1947 by UN Resolution 181. And why did Jordan, instead of annexing Cisjordan in 1949 and Egypt, instead of governing the Gaza Strip in 1967, never agree to have a Palestinian state in those territories?"
"The First Amendment specifically protected the free exercise of political speech, and yet under the BCRA the First Amendment now offers more protection to nude dancing and pornography than it does to political candidates who want to communicate with prospective constituents."
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
"These are not simply American claims, they are also the official positions of the Egyptian, Algerian, and Saudi governments."
Dalrymple On The Heart Of Suicide Hell
"Of course, hatred is the underlying emotion. A man in prison who told me that he wanted to be a suicide bomber was more hate-filled than any man I have ever met. The offspring of a broken marriage between a Muslim man and a female convert, he had followed the trajectory of many young men in his area: sex and drugs and rock and roll, untainted by anything resembling higher culture. Violent and aggressive by nature, intolerant of the slightest frustration to his will and frequently suicidal, he had experienced taunting during his childhood because of his mixed parentage. After a vicious rape for which he went to prison, he converted to a Salafist form of Islam and became convinced that any system of justice that could take the word of a mere woman over his own was irredeemably corrupt.
I noticed one day that his mood had greatly improved; he was communicative and almost jovial, which he had never been before. I asked him what had changed in his life for the better. He had made his decision, he said. Everything was resolved. He was not going to kill himself in an isolated way, as he had previously intended. Suicide was a mortal sin, according to the tenets of the Islamic faith. No, when he got out of prison he would not kill himself; he would make himself a martyr, and be rewarded eternally, by making himself into a bomb and taking as many enemies with him as he could.
Enemies, I asked; what enemies? How could he know that the people he killed at random would be enemies? They were enemies, he said, because they lived happily in our rotten and unjust society. Therefore, by definition, they were enemies—enemies in the objective sense, as Stalin might have put it—and hence were legitimate targets.
I asked him whether he thought that, in order to deter him from his course of action, it would be right for the state to threaten to kill his mother and his brothers and sisters—and to carry out this threat if he carried out his, in order to deter others like him.
The idea appalled him, not because it was yet another example of the wickedness of a Western democratic state, but because he could not conceive of such a state acting in this unprincipled way. In other words, he assumed a high degree of moral restraint on the part of the very organism that he wanted to attack and destroy."
(HT Charles) Dalrymple gets to the heart of the matter. One part mental illness and one part attacking us in -- and relying upon -- the heart of our virtue. And on reflection, it's nearly impossible to distinguish this from the moonbats...
As Wretchard pointed out, we have it correctly sized up as a long one. Well, on our more sanguine days anyway...
I noticed one day that his mood had greatly improved; he was communicative and almost jovial, which he had never been before. I asked him what had changed in his life for the better. He had made his decision, he said. Everything was resolved. He was not going to kill himself in an isolated way, as he had previously intended. Suicide was a mortal sin, according to the tenets of the Islamic faith. No, when he got out of prison he would not kill himself; he would make himself a martyr, and be rewarded eternally, by making himself into a bomb and taking as many enemies with him as he could.
Enemies, I asked; what enemies? How could he know that the people he killed at random would be enemies? They were enemies, he said, because they lived happily in our rotten and unjust society. Therefore, by definition, they were enemies—enemies in the objective sense, as Stalin might have put it—and hence were legitimate targets.
I asked him whether he thought that, in order to deter him from his course of action, it would be right for the state to threaten to kill his mother and his brothers and sisters—and to carry out this threat if he carried out his, in order to deter others like him.
The idea appalled him, not because it was yet another example of the wickedness of a Western democratic state, but because he could not conceive of such a state acting in this unprincipled way. In other words, he assumed a high degree of moral restraint on the part of the very organism that he wanted to attack and destroy."
(HT Charles) Dalrymple gets to the heart of the matter. One part mental illness and one part attacking us in -- and relying upon -- the heart of our virtue. And on reflection, it's nearly impossible to distinguish this from the moonbats...
As Wretchard pointed out, we have it correctly sized up as a long one. Well, on our more sanguine days anyway...
Monday, October 31, 2005
Miniter On ...
Pushing back the hands of the Tinfoil clock. It's a reasonably persuasive piece and I hope he's right. Unfortunately, it doesn't invalidate the basic Tinfoil Apocalypse thesis: Technology keeps growing but their minds don't...
"Islam has always been militant and the West only recently supine. In fairness, Islam's only fault may be that it retained a belief in itself long after the West embraced self-disgust. It may be that Gingrich's Long War is less about fighting Muslims than about the West rediscovering itself. While it's apparent battlefields may be in the mountains, jungles and desert fastnesses, the only frontier that matters is in its own heart."
Sunday, October 30, 2005
"If the media wanted the US to lose this War in Iraq what would they change about their reporting today?"
COMMENT OF THE DAY -- AND MORE: "It is for these reasons that the eventual resolution of the war on terror is inextricably bound up with dismantling the welfare state, with one side in the civil war absolutely determined not to reopen the issue. The tipping point which leads to total war, our own Maginot Line, runs now through our own societies and will only be crossed in locality after locality as affluent professionals and their children, rather than immigrants, less educated citizens and inner city welfare recipients, are blown apart." As you can imagine, you need to read Wretchard's post first...
"Islamofascists are cowards. They attack unarmed civilians precisely because they know they cannot succeed with their activity any other way. Anyone who would plan and carry out this kind of crime has no sense of humanity, honor, or worth. The only rational response is to find them and kill them before they attack more children for their sick and twisted motives."
Saturday, October 29, 2005
India pays the beheader's price today. Although it's nothing new, of course. And France RSN. They're both such mindless allies of BusHitler don't you know...
Friday, October 28, 2005
POST OF THE DAY: Marc and Scooter. Don't let the door hit you in the butt! I am curious though if there's still a romance / somebody used somebody angle here between Scooter and Judy...
Tinfoil. Apocalyse. Approacheth. David. Telleth.
"For the West, whose command centre is ultimately the White House, the question has been how to assess the ayatollahs’ intentions. Would they respond to external challenges, and internal decay, by gradually admitting the necessity of reforms? Might they capitulate? Or would they (in every sense of the phrase) “go nuclear”?
To people like me, the answer has been plain for several years now. It should now be plain to everyone else. President Ahmadinejad’s bold repetition of the promise to bring about a new Holocaust, in combination with Iran’s scarcely-concealed race to become a nuclear power with long-range missile delivery systems, leaves nothing ambiguous. But then, neither did Ahmadinejad’s recent underreported, psychopathic speech to the U.N. General Assembly. And it should be remembered that even his opponent in the Iranian presidential run-off last June, Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, had called repeatedly for Israel’s annihilation, as speaker of the Majlis through much of the 1980s.
The Iranian Holocaust policy is thus nothing new. What is new is the way it is being declared, openly and internationally. And as Tony Blair, the British prime minister, hinted aloud yesterday, we have come to the point where we must consider military means to make the Iranian policy change.
"To anybody in Europe knowing our history,” Mr Blair said, “when we hear statements like that made about Israel it makes us feel very angry.” He actually looked angry. "Ask yourself: A state like that, with an attitude like that, having a nuclear weapon?"
Condemnation came from many unusual quarters, including the Palestinian Authority, which must be uneasily aware that an Iranian nuclear strike that eradicates Israel, will also have the effect of eradicating them. Even Kofi Annan expressed his displeasure.
North American media have had no time to report these world-shaking events, this week, for President Bush has been manoeuvred into a political pit inside the Beltway, and that’s what they live for. That we cannot afford to have a U.S. President tied down with cheap domestic controversies, at a time like this, was one of my unstated reasons for luke-warmly supporting the Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers.
I have myself been unsure whether the wiser course were sabotage rather than direct attack. For years I have thought the West should be trying harder not to appease, but rather to undermine, the Iranian regime, by aggressively supporting its domestic opponents. An external attack might help the regime rally domestic support. And of course it would have to be done over the demonstrating bodies of the worlds’ angry Left. Therefore try every option, short of open war.
I don’t think “every other option” is credible any more. We must look squarely at what is before us, and not for an excuse to look away.
It should be realized that President Ahmadinejad’s threats -- and his subsequent failure to retract them -- themselves constitute acts of war. The Israelis, at the least, are in a moral and legal position to act in self-defence; and all decent men and women are under a moral obligation to support them."
RTWT.
UPDATE: What "wipe"?
AND AGAIN: "... my guess is the UN's response will to be to name Iran to the Commission on Human Rights as the chair."
To people like me, the answer has been plain for several years now. It should now be plain to everyone else. President Ahmadinejad’s bold repetition of the promise to bring about a new Holocaust, in combination with Iran’s scarcely-concealed race to become a nuclear power with long-range missile delivery systems, leaves nothing ambiguous. But then, neither did Ahmadinejad’s recent underreported, psychopathic speech to the U.N. General Assembly. And it should be remembered that even his opponent in the Iranian presidential run-off last June, Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, had called repeatedly for Israel’s annihilation, as speaker of the Majlis through much of the 1980s.
The Iranian Holocaust policy is thus nothing new. What is new is the way it is being declared, openly and internationally. And as Tony Blair, the British prime minister, hinted aloud yesterday, we have come to the point where we must consider military means to make the Iranian policy change.
"To anybody in Europe knowing our history,” Mr Blair said, “when we hear statements like that made about Israel it makes us feel very angry.” He actually looked angry. "Ask yourself: A state like that, with an attitude like that, having a nuclear weapon?"
Condemnation came from many unusual quarters, including the Palestinian Authority, which must be uneasily aware that an Iranian nuclear strike that eradicates Israel, will also have the effect of eradicating them. Even Kofi Annan expressed his displeasure.
North American media have had no time to report these world-shaking events, this week, for President Bush has been manoeuvred into a political pit inside the Beltway, and that’s what they live for. That we cannot afford to have a U.S. President tied down with cheap domestic controversies, at a time like this, was one of my unstated reasons for luke-warmly supporting the Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers.
I have myself been unsure whether the wiser course were sabotage rather than direct attack. For years I have thought the West should be trying harder not to appease, but rather to undermine, the Iranian regime, by aggressively supporting its domestic opponents. An external attack might help the regime rally domestic support. And of course it would have to be done over the demonstrating bodies of the worlds’ angry Left. Therefore try every option, short of open war.
I don’t think “every other option” is credible any more. We must look squarely at what is before us, and not for an excuse to look away.
It should be realized that President Ahmadinejad’s threats -- and his subsequent failure to retract them -- themselves constitute acts of war. The Israelis, at the least, are in a moral and legal position to act in self-defence; and all decent men and women are under a moral obligation to support them."
RTWT.
UPDATE: What "wipe"?
AND AGAIN: "... my guess is the UN's response will to be to name Iran to the Commission on Human Rights as the chair."
"Is he even sacrificing a good night's sleep? Is he sacrificing his future with his child? He is not sacrificing anything. He and his cabal of warmongering crooks are asking us Americans to give up our lives and our children's lives for his lies and mistakes and I am sure the grim milestone is barely causing a blip in their souls. ... In unrelated news in the past month, General MacArthur has retaken the Phillipines, many atolls continue to fall to American forces in the Pacific, and General Patton continues to roll through France on to Germany." (HT Glenn)
Monday, October 24, 2005
Sunday, October 23, 2005
Saturday, October 22, 2005
"As it happens, I'm pro-choice, too, but I don't fool myself into believing that Roe v. Wade was anything other than pure sophistry. As it happens, I also think married couples should have free access to contraceptives, but that Griswold v. Connecticut was a complete travesty, with all its talk about penumbras and emanations. One notes the irony however, in that Roe is essentially an emanation of Griswold."
"Heh. Politicians. The only class of people stupid enough to commit felonies to cover up misdemeanors. Or, as it appears in this case, to cover up something that probably wasn't even a crime at all.
But, hey, it's only perjury, right? If memory serves, in 1999, some argued that a little perjury wasn't even a crime worth anyone's attention at all...
Any takers on the odds for a pardon for Karl Rove?"
But, hey, it's only perjury, right? If memory serves, in 1999, some argued that a little perjury wasn't even a crime worth anyone's attention at all...
Any takers on the odds for a pardon for Karl Rove?"
What do (C)BS and Don Kofi have in common besides their excreble politics? Troubles understanding Word...
Friday, October 21, 2005
"Sadly, couples don't place a high priority on bringing children into the paradise they've created."
Thursday, October 20, 2005
Hell From Space Yet Again
Una handa la.
Stopped clock rule today at 60 Minutes:
That's right, me.
The f***ing imperialist pig dupe, me.
I've had enough today as you might notice.
By the way, this is one of the few countries in the world that's such a hellhole that Transparency International is stymied even gathering statistics about corruption. Off the scale in other words.
And a hellhole when viewed from space also:
... 
(Gray on the map indicates 3 CPI polls were not available; TI suggests these countries could be among the most corrupt. [D'oh! --ed] Black on the night picture from space indicates countries that are indisputably hellholes. Period. Halt. Full Stop.)
Una handa la.
Stopped clock rule today at 60 Minutes:
In his first U.S. television interview, the former U.S. Army sergeant who deserted to North Korea speaks for the first time about the abuse and control inflicted on him by the communist dictatorship over his nearly 40 years there. Charles Robert Jenkins tells Scott Pelley he Êhad a "U.S. Army" tattoo sliced off without anesthetic and was even told how often to have sex by his communist "leaders" in a 60 MINUTES interview to be broadcast Sunday, Oct. 23 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.Most leftists make excuses for this hellhole just as they claim the beheaders are oppressed by me.
That's right, me.
The f***ing imperialist pig dupe, me.
I've had enough today as you might notice.
By the way, this is one of the few countries in the world that's such a hellhole that Transparency International is stymied even gathering statistics about corruption. Off the scale in other words.
And a hellhole when viewed from space also:
(Gray on the map indicates 3 CPI polls were not available; TI suggests these countries could be among the most corrupt. [D'oh! --ed] Black on the night picture from space indicates countries that are indisputably hellholes. Period. Halt. Full Stop.)
Una handa la.
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
"However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once."
Condi Plays The Dating Game
Check this out from Ramos-Horta via DeMarche:
Well, only after a "severe" chastising of course. Oh so severe.
Really.
Fooled ya with that title, didn't I?
...I oppose wars as a matter of personal conviction. But because of my own experience, I also say that sometimes the use of force is necessary to put an end to tyranny and genocide. Can anyone condemn the U.S. for having intervened during World War II, to save the Jews from total annihilation? Can we condemn the NATO countries for intervening against Milosevic in 1998? For saving the Kosovars from annihilation? And moving to Afghanistan, it is often far too simplistic for blaming the U.S. But people forget that the U.S. gave an ultimatum to the Taliban regime to turn over Osama bin Laden. Pakistani diplomats traveled to Kabul twice, to persuade the Taliban to hand over Osama bin Laden. Here you have a state, Afghanistan, ruled by a regime that hosted a network and boasted about it, and defied the rest of the world about it. So, what should you do? The pacifists say "bring them to justice." Sure. Tell me how to bring them to justice without using force.This little tour-de-force (pardon the pun) was just one from Ramos-Horta set in the context of DeMarche's support for Condi holding her ground during the "dating game" in her latest testimony before the Senate. Thankfully, she held her ground and refused to set any dates for withdrawing from Iraq, properly noting that:
"The terrorists want us to get discouraged and quit," Rice said. "They believe we do not have the will to see this through."But the best line was reserved for one of DeMarche's commenters:
The next time someone on the left wants a date for withdrawal from Iraq, ask them for a date to give up on diplomacy with Iran. The Iraq date will be a month after the Iran date which will be 1 day before Iran is invaded. See if that doesn't stop the whining.That about sums it up. Well, except for some "accidental" bombings in Syria as well. Why let the Palis have a monopoly on "bombing accidents"? But in our case, the bomber crew will come back safe and sound to load up for another mission. This time actually hitting Iran.
Well, only after a "severe" chastising of course. Oh so severe.
Really.
Fooled ya with that title, didn't I?
"I also think it's interesting to see how many people are now pretending (1) that Miller's WMD/Iraq reporting didn't start until the Bush Administration's war buildup, when actually it goes back to the 1990s; and (2) that nobody else thought that we'd find vast WMD stockpiles when we invaded, when in fact everyone thought we would. (The valuable lesson for would-be Saddams -- don't run a bluff against the United States -- is also lost)."
Tuesday, October 18, 2005
Here's what W is for. Here's the result of his ludicrous inattention to real immigration justice. But don't worry -- Karl Rove controls my brain at all times. Yeah, right...
Sunday, October 16, 2005
WARREN AGAIN: "Bali is a favoured target because it is the one large island in Indonesia that was never converted to Islam. It remains Hindu..."
Steyn Time
You can’t tell the players without a scorecard, and that’s just the way the Western media intend to keep it. If you wake up one morning and switch on the TV to see the Empire State Building crumbling to dust, don’t be surprised if the announcer goes, “Insurging rebel militant forces today attacked key targets in New York. In other news, the president’s annual Ramadan banquet saw celebrities dancing into the small hours to Mullah Omar And His All-Girl Orchestra . . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)