Whaddaya Know?!

clipped from www.qando.net Think of the mortgage securities market as the World Series of Poker. In fact, a great book about it is Liar's Poker, by Michael Lewis. Lewis was a trainee at Salomon Brothers, and he learned phrases like "Big Swinging D___," which describes a swaggering, aggressive mortgage banker. Henry Paulson fits the model. The best players in this World Series of Poker are the folks at Goldman. Buffett just bought a stake in Goldman. That stake would be a lot more valuable if there were actually a poker game—that is, if mortgage securities were still trading. Right now, they're not trading. So Goldman is sitting there ready to play and no one is ready to play with them. Along comes Uncle Sam, who wants to take a one-hour lesson in poker and then sit down and play in the World Series with $700 billion in chips. And whaddaya know? Warren Buffett thinks Uncle Sam really has to get in the game.

That's Her

clipped from www.pajamasmedia.com Democrats are questioning whether Sarah Palin is qualified to be Vice President while Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker-In-Tongues-of-the-House is two heartbeats (and one with issues) away from the Presidency. Nancy Pelosi is proving herself completely unqualified to lead anything. I wouldn’t trust her to lead a troop of Girl Scouts. At a time when she should have been, umm, actually, leading the House (BTW, that means the entire House … both aisles), she morphed into House Majority Leader Pelosi, made a vicious partisan attack on Republicans, and derailed the $700B bail out. I’ll leave the parsing of her motivations to more connected observers, but I suspect it was based on partisan calculus, since the only leadership Pelosi has ever shown is in her capacity to attack the opposition. That's her.

Did I forget to mention she doesn't think we need to drill to get natural gas? It would be impolite to say what I'm thinking now...

Bankruptcy Instead

clipped from headingright.com Jeffrey A. Miron is senior lecturer in economics at Harvard University. A Libertarian, he was one of 166 academic economists who signed a letter to congressional leaders last week opposing the government bailout plan. … The current mess would never have occurred in the absence of ill-conceived federal policies. The federal government chartered Fannie Mae in 1938 and Freddie Mac in 1970; these two mortgage lending institutions are at the center of the crisis. The government implicitly promised these institutions that it would make good on their debts, so Fannie and Freddie took on huge amounts of excessive risk. Worse, beginning in 1977 and even more in the 1990s and the early part of this century, Congress pushed mortgage lenders and Fannie/Freddie to expand subprime lending. The industry was happy to oblige, given the implicit promise of federal backing, and subprime lending soared. … The obvious alternative to a bailout is letting troubled financial institutions declare bankruptcy.

Peace From Saudi Britain

clipped from www.youtube.com

Demands

clipped from www.youtube.com

Welcome To Pravda West

clipped from theanchoressonline.com I have a couple friends who work in the MSM, too, and one of them tells me the newsroom is (exact words) “unbelievably cavalier” about any complaints viewers register about their reports, what they ignore, their bias or the way they edit Republicans vs. the way the treat Dems. “Cavalier” as in the fix is in and they don’t even have to pretend to care what half the country thinks or wants. I suppose this is why print media and the press in general don’t care about their tumbling revenues; when The Pelosi gets the regulated internet and restricted Congress that she wants, and Obama gets his thugs and his Justice Department monitoring, intimidating and shutting down alternative media (and the dissenting voices we’ve been told are “patriotic” when a Republican is in the White House) the incestuous mainstream press will go back to being the only game in town. Pravda West.

The Missing Wind Down

clipped from corner.nationalreview.com I do not understand why those who've voted no should be labeled "irresponsible."  The senate evidently will not deign to take up this crisis legislation until Wednesday.  Meanwhile, even if you don't reject the bill on philosophical grounds (see e.g., Dick Armey's article on NRO today), there is massive room for improvement.  Why not take the time to try to improve it? This was a terrible bill.  To take just a few particulars, why is there no reform of the government interventions that got us to this point in the first place?  Why aren't Fannie and Freddie being wound down — even after we've now had to make explicit the implicit, disastrous government guarantee?  Why is Pelosi saying (as I noted in an earlier post) that the authority in the bill will allow the Treasury Department (perhaps soon an Obama Treasury Department) to take bad debt off the hands of mismanaged state and local governments?

Not So Lightly Back Then

clipped from jimtreacher.com Speaking of "bitch is the new black," the press didn't tread so lightly around Obama's astroturfing when it smeared Hillary. Remember that anti-Hillary "1984" ad way back in March '07, which was supposedly created by somebody with no connection to the Obama campaign? Well... The creator of the faux-Apple ad against Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has been unmasked as a Democratic operative who worked for a digital consulting firm with ties to Sen. Barack Obama, NBC News confirmed Wednesday night -- leaving Obama on the spot. Andrea Mitchell said that. On MSNBC. For some reason, way back in the old days (18 months ago) it wasn't racist to hold Obama accountable for his actions. Mitchell even said: The entire episode hangs a cloud over the Obama camp. Oh, I get it. A dark cloud, right? Next time leave your white hood at home, Andrea! No, on second thought, please wear it whenever you're on the air.

Original Sin

clipped from online.wsj.com The response? Rep. Barney Frank, who now vilifies Republican House members for questioning a policy of throwing another $700 billion on the bonfire "These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." The tale of lost opportunities and thwarted reform is a long one. As a reporter who covered the savings and loan meltdown of the late 1980s, I wish I had paid more attention to the next impending disaster. I knew Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were bad-faith actors. I just didn't realize how much their recklessness would spread to other players in the financial markets and create the conditions for the current meltdown. But make no mistake. When the history of this debacle is written, Washington's failure to supervise and rein in Fannie and Freddie will be seen as the original sin.

Will Emerging

clipped from proteinwisdom.com In this sense, the linguistic turn — along with those who’ve worked to insinuate its teachings into our very epistemic interpretive substructure — is moving toward its ultimate victory: turning descriptive postmodern philosophy into a prescriptive postmodern paradigm, one that deconstructs the very notion of meaning, turning every battle into one of will, with “meaning” becoming nothing more than that narrative which is imposed upon us by the plurality. This is akin to tyranny of the majority — akin to “democratizing” something (namely, meaning as fixed by intent, and a recognition of whose intent one is privileging) that should, by its very nature, be assumed fixed and intractable for purposes of interpretation. Concludes Kurtz: So continued media silence on Obama’s intimidation tactics threatens not only the fairness of this election, but press freedom itself. Yet to defend the freedom of the right as if it were their own is something our left-leaning press has forgotten how to do.

Al Qaeda Marches In Manhattan? Umm... No

clipped from www.youtube.com

Welcome to our new puerile overlords. You know. The ones that are uniformly sophisticates and intelligentsia.

Like Stalin.

And soon to have the guns and kangaroo courts to match.

The Problem With Obama's Washington

clipped from corner.nationalreview.com Two years ago, I called for reform of this corruption at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Congress did nothing. The Administration did nothing. Senator Obama did nothing, and actually profited from this system of abuse and scandal. While Fannie and Freddie were working to keep Congress away from their house of cards, Senator Obama was taking their money. He got more, in fact, than any other member of Congress, except for the Democratic chairmen of the committee that oversees them. And while Fannie Mae was betraying the public trust, somehow its former CEO had managed to gain my opponent's trust to the point that Senator Obama actually put him in charge of his vice presidential search. My friends, this is the problem with Washington. People like Senator Obama have been too busy gaming the system and haven't ever done a thing to actually challenge the system.

A Very Painful Laugh

clipped from www.youtube.com

Of course, this one misses the Fannie/Freddie nuclear moral hazard that attracted the Wall Street morons like flies, but it's still worth some very painful laughs...

"Equality"

clipped from proteinwisdom.com The only thing that has changed is the packaging. And we as a society have become so conditioned to examine the packaging — with even many of the elites, the useful idiots, presuming to take a disinterested look at things such as height, posture, style of dress, etc — that we’ve lost sight of what it is that lurks inside the box. In Obama’s case, it is the political and philosophical desire to have the US join the world community as an equal — and to do so, given our current position as a hyperpower, means, necessarily, that we as a country need to be taken down a few notches, to abase ourselves (as Carter would’ve had us do), or to surrender military and strategic advantages, while keeping us dependent on foreign energy and entangled in transnationalist endeavors, so that the rest of the world doesn’t look upon us as a “bully,” but as an “equal.” Equality of outcome over equality of opportunity. This is the essence of socialist thinking.

The Real Thing

clipped from www.powerlineblog.com One of the more farcical claims that Democrats have leveled against Governor Sarah Palin is that as mayor, she "banned" books from the Wasilla, Alaska public library. The claim was a complete fabrication, and anyway, a mayor has no power to "ban" a book. Suppressing a work of literature in our time requires href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4837994.ece">something quite different: Scotland Yard's counter-terrorist command yesterday foiled an alleged plot by Islamic extremists to kill the publisher of a forthcoming novel featuring sexual encounters between the Prophet Muhammad and his child bride. It was withdrawn from publication in America last month after its publisher there, Random House, said it feared a violent reaction by “a small radical segment” of Muslims. It said “credible and unrelated sources” had warned that the book could incite violence. That's how you go about suppressing a book. No one seems to mind much, though, when the real thing happens.

Scenes From A Burning House

clipped from www.youtube.com

Plenty of Repulicans were at the trough along with the Dems. But show me any Dems except for Bill Clinton who have any claims to trying to fix it. And McCain was one of the co-sponsors of the Republican effort in 2005 to take a run at it. And even Clinton's claims are largely political maneuvering as usual.

Yes, Clinton appears at the end. Watch for it.

Burning Down The House

clipped from www.youtube.com

Here's the overall summary. Of course, there was a large portion of investors flipping properties as well once the skids were greased by Fannie and Freddie. This is one of the largest moral hazards in history hands down.

And it's O's baby as much as any other Democrat. Mr. Acorn himself.

Of Graft And Power

clipped from www.pajamasmedia.com Much of the blogosphere is up in arms because of the provision in Senator Dodd’s financial bailout bill that might funnel profits from the bailout plan to ACORN Housing (related to the disreputable activist group ACORN), and other more reputable service organizations. I have read Dodd’s proposed statute and in some respects, it is far worse than has been reported. Senator Dodd has placed a loophole in the bill that is explicitly designed to siphon off tens or hundreds of billions of dollars to the Housing Trust Fund and the Capital Magnet Fund even if there are no net profits in the $700 billion venture. You know, it would be easier for me to believe this was a crisis, if the people in charge were acting like it was a crisis, instead of just an opportunity for graft. Then again, to some of these people, everything is just an opportunity for graft.

Missing Recusal Redux

clipped from proteinwisdom.com Mind you, I don’t give Republicans who’ve voted against oversight for Fannie and Freddie a pass, nor do I give greedy Wall Street financiers a pass, or the home equity loan bastards who now feel they’re entitled to a bail-out. But tucked into the Congressional provisions we now find that there are bail-outs for student loans and car debt. While Dem-leaning policy wonks talk about the inherent unfairness of the Feds permitting certain firms to fail and buying others, they seem not to mind that the government has intervened to save some homeowners from foreclosure while letting those who have gone before them sink, or that some people may have paid off their student debt or automotive financing, while they contemplate making us hold the bag for this. Are any of them going to recuse themselves for having accepted discounted loans from CountryWide or any of the other mortgage lenders? [...]

Epitomized

clipped from isteve.blogspot.com Here's George W. Bush's speech from six years ago to the White House Conference on Increasing Minority Homeownership. The precise programs he was advocating aren't terribly important, they're fairly minor, but the tone of his speech is important. It puts the Presidential Seal of Approval on the orgy of dubious mortgage lending (Down payments? We don't need no steenking down payments!) in the name of increasing minority homeownership. This is the bipartisan consensus epitomized. By the way, this isn't some eloquent oration Michael Gerson wrote and Bush just read it stolidly off the teleprompter. As you can see from the garbled syntax, this is Bush winging it, straight from his heart. He really believes all this stuff.

Of course, O could have made this speech. Just with a more sonorous tone and only slightly more coherently.

Innumeracy Update: The Diversity Depression

clipped from isteve.blogspot.com "The Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies reports that the rate of subprime mortgages for Latinos and African Americans is about double the rate for whites. In 2006, subprimes made up one in four mortgages (26 percent) made to whites, 47 percent of those to Latinos and 53 percent of mortgages that went to African Americans."

Without knowing the exact proportion of the races in taking out mortgages, this would seem to suggest that 30+% of mortgages in 2007 were subprime.

And we wonder why there's a problem? Come again?

Mayor Daley Is A Proud Daddy To The OThug

clipped from www.pajamasmedia.com PATTERICO sees href="http://patterico.com/2008/09/25/obama-uses-thuggish-lawyer-tactics-to-try-to-squelch-nras-criticism/">a pattern of intimidation leading up to the Obama campaign's latest threats: "In 2006, when ABC ran 'The Path to 9/11,' Harry Reid & Co. wrote a mafia-style letter threatening ABC’s broadcast license. In 2004, a group of Democrat lawmakers wrote Rupert Murdoch and threatened Fox News’s broadcast license over what they believed was skewed reporting. And the DNC threatened Sinclair Broadcasting’s broadcast license over an anti-Kerry documentary called 'Stolen Honor.' Kerry spokesthug Chad Clanton was quoted as saying: 'I think they’re going to regret doing this, and they better hope we don’t win.' He hastened to add that it wasn’t a threat." Meanwhile, href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122239260447677641.html">Ted Stevens is doing the same kind of thing. An old-fashioned corrupt politician using lawyers to silence critics? Is that the kind of image Obama wants to foster?

Acorn Under The Radar

clipped from article.nationalreview.com Acorn prefers to fly under the national radar, organizing locally in liberal urban areas — where, Stern observes, local legislators and reporters are often “slow to grasp how radical Acorn’s positions really are.” Acorn’s new goals are municipal “living wage” laws targeting “big-box” stores like Wal-Mart, rolling back welfare reform, and regulating banks — efforts styled as combating “predatory lending.” Unfortunately, instead of helping workers, Acorn’s living-wage campaigns drive businesses out of the very neighborhoods where jobs are needed most. Acorn’s opposition to welfare reform only threatens to worsen the self-reinforcing cycle of urban poverty and family breakdown. Perhaps most mischievously, says Stern, Acorn uses banking regulations to pressure financial institutions into massive “donations” that it uses to finance supposedly non-partisan voter turn-out drives.

Ack-Ack

clipped from www.davidwarrenonline.com In the public order I recall from my youth, there was still some general understanding of such things. At the hint of serious public (as opposed to personal) scandal, journalistic and political forces were certainly deployed. But I do not recall the withering ack-ack and “gotcha!” that has become the hourly routine in our media. What President Clinton called “the politics of personal destruction” -- and assiduously practised -- has become the norm. It is made worse by the overwhelming left-bias of the mainstream news media, where the targets are selected consistently from one side. My impression is that the politicians caught the disease from the journalists. By now, from all sides, we have abandoned most discussion of public policy and intention, and all parties indulge in a child’s game, to “gotcha” and “[noun]-gate” one another, interspersed with expressions of hypocritical outrage when each in turn is hit.

Appalled

clipped from www.davidwarrenonline.com And finally, appalled by the media and chattering heads calling the whole mess a "crisis of capitalism" when the plain facts show the opposite. The whole "subprime mortgage" instrument was invented by bankers specifically to assuage heavy-handed Congressional demands to swell the number of minority and low-income homeowners, 20 years ago. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were already bloated quasi-government bureaucracies, dangerously freed from many conventional market disciplines. And among the chief beneficiaries of the current bailout are the most extravagant contributors to the Democrat Party. As one of my more knowing correspondents put it: "Wall Street loves money but hates free markets, because free markets distribute economic benefits to those who earn them, rather than to those best able to seize them."

Can't Run This Way

clipped from proteinwisdom.com A free society cannot run this way. If information is power, those who control the information and its mainstream dissemination are in a position to act as the most important swing vote in any election. That the press has given up, at this late stage (and despite declines in readership and public trust), any serious attempt to report objectively suggests that we are now quite immersed in a battle for the very principles of a democratic republic. Progressives have decided that the ends justify the means — that lies in the service of greater truths (as defined by their own ideology) are both pragmatic and utilitarian measures to be adopted so that “we” can finally get things “right,” and accept government from a permanent political class, a new aristocracy, that will expand the federal government in ways that will protect us from ourselves, in the process, assuring that ever new generations will be reliable upon the good graces of the federal government for their survival.

Carefully Chosen: Barry And Bomb Boy Billy

clipped from hughhewitt.townhall.com To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our setereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society's stifling constraints. We weren't indifferent or careless or insecure. We were alienated. No, to "avoid being mistaken for a sell-out," to achieve the "distance" he wanted, to show his "solidarity," he'd find someone who'd thrown more than metaphorical, verbal bombs. Reading these two paragraphs, one cannot be at all surprised to learn that almost immediately after the publication of his first book, Obama eagerly entwined himself with Bill Ayers.

Not Fooling Anyone There Bill

clipped from www.huffingtonpost.com Given that we would never have had the odious George W. Bush in the White House in the first place if it wasn't for your blow jobs, Bill, it seems obvious that you owe it to the people of this country, and especially to the parents whose kids died in the Iraq War that Gore would never have started, and to all the parents whose kids would be killed in the WarFest that would be a McCain/Palin -- sorry, Palin/McCain administration -- to do everything in your power to get Barack Obama elected. But that's not what you're doing, Bill, and it's not going unnoticed. We see your rage, Bill, it's too huge to hide. We see that -- as Chris Rock so brilliantly pointed out -- it pains you to even speak Obama's name. We see you petulantly rooting against him even as you go through the motions of doing the barest minimum on his behalf to avoid being blamed if he loses. You're not fooling anyone, Bill.

Had This Been Palin...

clipped from corner.nationalreview.com I think in the space of about the last 24 hours, Joe Biden claimed that the AIG bailout was bad, but then said it wasn't bad; that we did not need to burn coal; that his apology about the dirty McCain ad was, as they say, inoperative; that FDR once went on television to address the nation after the stock market crash of '29 (that's a twofer that trumps Obama's Americans liberating Auschwitz); and all but said that McCain took a $50,000 bribe. Not a bad day's work — encompassing terrible energy policy, flip-flopping, historical ignorance, and slander. And this comes on top of Palin the "good looking" "Lt. Governor" of Alaska, Hillary as the better VP pick than himself, the patriotism of paying higher taxes, and so on. Had this been Palin, the election would now be over.

But Then There Might Not Be A Quorum

clipped from corner.nationalreview.com Very odd to see a Sen. Chris Dodd, of all people, today defiant and outspoken in his regard for the people: if only he had returned (never too late) lavish contributions from Freddie Mac and Frannie Mae (as Senate banking chairman, he was their #1 targeted recipient and raked in over $160,000); if only in the midst of a loan crisis, he had not received below-market-rate VIP loans from the now late great, melted-down Countrywide for whose parochial interests he championed; if only he had not been instrumental in blocking past proposed firewalls that might have prevented the collapse of the two agencies that were the catalyst for this mess; if only he had a bit of contrition for his own role in this national mess. Surely in the interest of transparency and conflict of interest, any Senator, Republican or Democrat, who accepted money from Freddie and Frannie, or any of the imperiled investment houses, should recuse themselves from the present hearings—but then there might not be a quorum.

Lowlights

clipped from proteinwisdom.com - The Community Reinvestment Act. This 1977 law compels banks to make loans to poor borrowers who often cannot repay them. Banks that failed to make enough of these loans were often held hostage by activists when they next sought some regulatory approval. Robert Litan, an economist at the Brookings Institution, told the Washington Post this year that banks “had to show they were making a conscious effort to make loans to subprime borrowers.” The much-maligned Phil Gramm fought to limit these CRA requirements in the 1990s, albeit to little effect and much political jeering. Our point here isn’t to absolve Wall Street or pretend there weren’t private excesses. But the investment mistakes would surely have been less extreme, and ultimately their damage more containable, if not for the enormous political support and subsidy for mortgage credit. Beware politicians who peddle fables that cast themselves as the heroes.

And Don't Forget The Wet Dream

clipped from proteinwisdom.com Power, after all, is the end game — and many Dems, it seems, may be willing to let the system implode with the hope that they’ll have free reign to rebuild the system anew from amid the rubble. A socialist’s wet dream, really, and one that is beginning to blot the sheets of an increasing number of liberal Dems who, as they look around, see that the press is willing to perpetuate their fables about deregulation and “corporate corruption” — without bothering to acknowledge that congressional corruption, the vast majority of it tied to Democrats, along with politically-charged social engineering policies that created fundamental changes in the way credit was allocated, is what lies at the heart of the current mess, and that, even further, the Democrats blocked reforms that may have prevented the meltdown.

Reduced To Fact

clipped from proteinwisdom.com the vast accumulation of toxic mortgage debt that poisoned the global financial system was driven by the aggressive buying of subprime and Alt-A mortgages, and mortgage-backed securities, by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The poor choices of these two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) — and their sponsors in Washington — are largely to blame for our current mess. How did we get here? Let’s review: In order to curry congressional support after their accounting scandals in 2003 and 2004, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac committed to increased financing of “affordable housing.” They became the largest buyers of subprime and Alt-A mortgages between 2004 and 2007, with total GSE exposure eventually exceeding $1 trillion. In doing so, they stimulated the growth of the subpar mortgage market and substantially magnified the costs of its collapse. It is important to understand that, as GSEs, Fannie and Freddie were viewed in the capital markets as government-backed buyers

O's "Remarkable Success"

clipped from proteinwisdom.com All a very fancy way of saying that Ayers, with the help of his front man, Obama, was using grant money to turn schools into propaganda factories for Howard Zinn’s version of American History — without any concern whatever to improvement in test scores or the like, which pedestrian concerns Mr Ayers likely looked at as bourgeois adherence to a failed system that wasn’t addressing the real issues: that of changing the American political system by way of churning out activist soldiers to agitate for change based on racial and class grievances that are, thanks to the failures of the education system Mr Ayers presumed to steer, self-fulfilling. Still, from another perspective, perhaps the CAC was a remarkable success — training, as it must have, the next generation of “community organizers,” race pimps, class warriors, and apologists for all manner of attacks on the US from within and from abroad.

When Buying And Selling Is Legislated, The First Things To Be Bought And Sold Are The Legislators

clipped from hotair.com By special request of Ace. Nothing here you haven’t read and/or heard before, but Fox deserves a little publicity for being willing to challenge the narrative. Especially now that we’re about to be told it’s McCain’s campaign manager and his lobbyist pals, not the Democrats they lobbied who actually cast the votes, who are the real culprits in all this.

Fact Check Broken Again

They're too stupid to know that O gets an "F" in constitutional law for this little gem. Anyone sentient knows that Congress can not vote to eliminate the Second Amendment.

Well at least until O takes power anyway...

clipped from campaignspot.nationalreview.com Finally, FactCheck.org concludes: At a campaign stop in Duryea, Pa., in early September, Obama again href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/out-west-obama.html">attempted to reassure gun owners that he doesn't intend to take away their guns, and couldn't even if he wanted to: Obama (Sept. 5): The bottom line is this. If you’ve got a rifle, you’ve got a shotgun, you’ve got a gun in your house, I’m not taking it away. Alright? So they can keep on talking about it but this is just not true. And by the way, here’s another thing you’ve got to understand. Even if I wanted to take it away, I couldn’t get it done. I don’t have the votes in Congress. The fact that FactCheck thinks this reinforces the argument that Obama respects the Second Amendment speak volumes. Pro-Second Amendment lawmakers just don't talk this way.

45 Million? Really?

clipped from www.powerlineblog.com However, Sally Pipes, in her Sunday Examiner column, shows that the 45.7 million uninsured figure is misleading as a barometer of the state of health insurance coverage in the U.S. She identifies four groups within that figure: (1) people who will quickly transfer from one insurance plan to another, (2) illegal immigrants, (3) individuals who make more than $50,000 a year but who elect not to purchase health insurance (usually because they are young and healthy), and (4) individuals who are eligible for government assistance with their health care through programs like Medicaid and SCHIP, but who do not avail themselves of that assistance. According to Pipes, if one subtracts these people from the 45.7 million figure, the number drops to approximately 8 million. If one adds back in those who make between $50,000 and $75,000 a year, the figure is roughly 16 million.

Of Shame And Oblivion

clipped from www.powerlineblog.com I concluded our post on the Dems' disgraceful ad by saying, "I guess now we'll find out whether Barack Obama is capable of shame." As best we can tell he isn't, but apparently Joe Biden is. It is deeply ironic that earlier today, the New York Times tried to assert that it has critiqued the two campaigns' ads with equal vigor. In fact, Joe Biden has assessed the Dems' attack ads with more candor than the Times. Just one more milestone in the Times' sad descent into oblivion.

NINJA NYeT Flashback

clipped from greenwichrealestate.blogspot.com From the NYT's article: In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders. The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring. Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.

Change We Can Fake

clipped from mypetjawa.mu.nu