Without A Trace

clipped from www.redstate.com The author goes on to complain about FISA, and the way that the current administration is apparently arguing for much broader definitions than the last one ever did over what the government can and can’t be held liable for when it comes to surveillance. This is done without a trace of visible irony, or with any indication that we - not to mention Glenn Greenwald, who this guy is apparently holding up as an example of moral rectitude* - knew all along that the President wasn’t going to be the anti-FISA warrior of the Left’s dreams. We weren’t exactly shy about saying so at the time, either. A bit odd, don’t you think?