Prudence Isn't Dead Yet?

Check out this piece by Robert Samuelson of Newsweek:

Just so. Today’s polarization mainly divides the broad public from political, intellectual and media elites. Of course, sharp differences define democracy. We’ve always had them. From Iraq to homosexual marriage, deep disagreements remain. But the venom of today’s debates often transcends disagreement. Your opponents—whether liberal or conservative—must not only have bad ideas. Increasingly, they must also be bad people who are dishonest, selfish and venal.

Among politicians, the bitterness reflects less political competition, especially in the House of Representatives. Democrats and Republicans increasingly have safe seats. In 2002, 83 percent of House incumbents won at least 60 percent of the vote; in 1992 only 66 percent of incumbents won with that margin. As a result, members speak more to their parties’ “bases,” which provide most electoral and financial support. There’s less need to appeal to the center. The Founders saw the House as responding quickly to public opinion. But “the barometer is broken,” says veteran congressional correspondent Richard E. Cohen of National Journal.

As for media and intellectual elites—commentators, academics, columnists, professional advocates—they’re in an attention-grabbing competition. They need to establish themselves as brand names. For many, stridency is a strategy. The right feeds off the left and the left feeds off the right, and although their mutual criticisms constitute legitimate debate, they’re also economic commodities. To be regarded by one side as a lunatic is to be regarded by the other as a hero—and that can usually be taken to the bank through more TV appearances, higher lecture fees, fatter book sales and larger audiences and group memberships. Polarization serves their interests. Principle and self-promotion blend.

All this is understandable and, in a democracy, perhaps unavoidable. But it distorts who we are and poses a latent danger: Someday we might become as hopelessly polarized as we’re already supposed to be. [Emphasis added. Hat tip Simon.]

A rare "journalistic lapse" from Newsweek -- almost up there with John Burns of the NYeT. READ THE WHOLE THING -- AND THEN REMEMBER THIS LITTLE DITTY? Brewing, brewing, brewing...