clipped from www.amazon.com
2. On page 130, Akerlof and Shiller claim, "In the absence of social security people would grossly undersave." Isn't it just the opposite? It is BECAUSE of social security that people grossly undersave "Without intervention by the government the economy will suffer massive swings in employment." Again, shouldn't it be just the opposite? It is BECAUSE of intevention by the government that the economy suffers massive swings in employment and output. |
A shocker I know. And Lord knows he wouldn't be caught dead anywhere near "Meltdown". Then he might actually learn something.
Speaking of which, if you're not going to take me up on my free "Meltdown" book offer, you can at least take an hour and go listen to Tom Woods give a great interview about the book.
Speaking of which, if you're not going to take me up on my free "Meltdown" book offer, you can at least take an hour and go listen to Tom Woods give a great interview about the book.